Monday, November 9, 2015

Giving Birth, Breast-feeding May Help Women’s Long-Term Health

Researchers find link between childbirth and lower risk of death from cancer or heart disease

senior and baby

FRIDAY, Oct. 30, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Having babies and breast-feeding may extend a woman’s life, new research suggests.

Other beneficial factors appear to include starting menstruation at a later age and using birth control pills.

Researchers analyzed data from nearly 323,000 women in 10 European countries who were followed for an average of about 13 years. During that time, more than 14,300 of the women died. Nearly 6,000 died of cancer and more than 2,400 from circulatory system diseases.

The study found fewer deaths among women who gave birth between the ages of 26 and 30 than among those who were older or who gave birth at age 20 or younger. Women who breast-fed also lived longer than those who did not.

The risk of cancer death was lower in women who had given birth than among those who had not, and was lower among those who gave birth to two or three children than among those with one child. Among women who never smoked or were former smokers, those who used birth control pills were less likely to die of cancer than those who did not.

The study also found that women who had given birth, breast-fed and started menstruating when they were 15 or older had a lower risk of death from circulatory diseases, and those who had given birth and breast-fed had a reduced risk of death from heart disease.

While the study found an association between childbirth, breast-feeding and life span, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

The study was published Oct. 29 in the journal BMC Medicine.

Changes in hormone levels may explain the reduced risk of death among women who had children, breast-fed or used birth control pills, according to Melissa Merritt, a research fellow in the School of Public Health at Imperial College London in England, and colleagues.

However, more research is needed to determine how the reproductive factors identified in this study may extend life. That knowledge could lead to new ways to improve women’s long-term health, the investigators said.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about women’s health.




Challenges for Extreme Preemies Can Last into Teens

But majority of very preterm or very small newborns do well, experts say.

Challenges for Extreme Preemies Can Last into Teens

MONDAY, Nov. 9, 2015 (HealthDay News) — The complications and medical treatments that extremely preterm or extremely small newborns experience in their first weeks of life can have an impact years later, a new study reveals.

Preemies who had bleeding in their brain or who received corticosteroids were at particular risk for more difficulty with school or thinking skills, the researchers found, regardless of their environment growing up.

“The most surprising finding was that the effects of events occurring in the nursery had such long-lasting and persistent effects on thinking ability and academic performance, even into late adolescence,” said study author Dr. Lex Doyle. He is a professor of neonatal pediatrics at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Parkville, Victoria, in Australia.

“These events were as important or even more important than the effects of the environment, such as the mother’s education level and social class,” Doyle said. “These findings are contrary to conventional wisdom that the early effects from the newborn nursery would wane, and the environmental effects would dominate as children grow older.”

However, Doyle added that the majority of the infants in the study did well as they grew up. And another pediatric expert pointed out that the study looked at babies who were born almost two decades ago, and great strides have been made in the care of extreme preemies since the 1990s.

The findings were published online Nov. 9 in the journal Pediatrics.

The researchers followed nearly 300 Australian children born at less than 28 weeks of their mother’s pregnancy or weighing less than 2.2 pounds at birth in 1991 and 1992. Typical pregnancies usually last about 40 weeks.

The researchers compared these children to more than 260 others with a birth weight of at least 5.5 pounds.

All underwent assessments of intelligence and thinking skills at ages 2, 5, 8 and 18. The researchers also compared their academic achievement when the children were 8 and 18 years old.

Those born very early or with a very low birth weight scored worse in academics and on the so-called cognitive assessments at all ages compared to the children born with an average birth weight. The longer the mother’s pregnancy had lasted for the preemies, the better their scores on mental abilities.

“The events in the uterus that lead to being born too early or too small, and all the complications that occur after birth to these fragile babies, set back their brain growth and development,” Doyle said. But individuals vary, and some grow and develop normally, too.

“Despite the fact that we identify more problems in children born too early or too small than in children born on time and of normal size, the majority do remarkably well,” Doyle said.

A pediatric specialist agreed.

Most of the preemies in this study did not have the worst outcomes, and most tested in the average range, said Dr. Andrew Adesman, chief of developmental and behavioral pediatrics at Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York.

“Parents of children born extremely prematurely should not be overly concerned by the findings of this study,” Adesman said. “Poor developmental outcomes are relatively uncommon.”

The two factors linked to children’s poorer outcomes were brain bleeding or receiving corticosteroids. Some preemies receive synthetic steroids to help their lungs grow faster and to reduce their risk of respiratory problems, according to background information in the study.

“It is not completely possible to avoid treatment with corticosteroids because some babies will die without them,” Doyle said. “The decision to treat with corticosteroids is never taken lightly.”

He noted that fewer children receive corticosteroids today than in the early 1990s, and the doses tend to be smaller. In addition, giving mothers magnesium sulfate just before a preterm birth can improve children’s long-term outcomes, Doyle said.

Other improvements in care have come a long way as well, Adesman said.

“It is important to remember as well that these babies were born 20 years ago, and that the quality of perinatal care and neonatal care have likely both improved,” Adesman said. That suggests “that some of the outcomes in this study may be overall less likely for similarly premature babies born today.”

Regardless of how early children are born, parents play a significant role in supporting their growth and development, Doyle said.

“Parents should nurture their children, talk to them, read to them, play with them, love them and involve them in everyday family activities,” Doyle said. “Individual children may be identified with particular difficulties that need specific treatment, including at school, and ensuring their children receive such treatments is important.”

More information

For more about preterm birth, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

SOURCES: Lex W. Doyle, M.D., professor, neonatal pediatrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Royal Women’s Hospital in Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Andrew Adesman, M.D., chief, developmental and behavioral pediatrics, Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York, New Hyde Park, N.Y.; December 2015 Pediatrics

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay External Links Disclaimer Logo.   All rights reserved.

For family physician in The Woodlands, TX, USA, contact Dr. Fadi Ghanem, MD




Widely Used Antibiotics May Raise Heart Risks, Review Finds

Macrolides were linked to small, but significant, chances of sudden cardiac death.

Widely Used Antibiotics May Raise Heart Risks, Review Finds

MONDAY, Nov. 9, 2015 (HealthDay News) — A widely used class of antibiotics is associated with a small but measurable increased risk of sudden cardiac death, researchers report.

These antibiotics — called macrolides — are used to treat infections such as pneumonia, bronchitis and some sexually transmitted diseases.

In the new report, the investigators analyzed 33 studies that were conducted between 1966 and 2015, and included a total of more than 20 million patients. The studies compared patients who took macrolides, other types of antibiotics, or no antibiotics.

Macrolides include the antibiotics erythromycin, azithromycin (Zithromax), clarithromycin (Biaxin) and quinolone.

The results revealed a small, but statistically significant, association between taking macrolides and increased risk of sudden cardiac death. But the review did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between these medications and sudden cardiac death.

The study was published Nov. 9 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

“The absolute risks of sudden cardiac death and cardiac death are small, so it should likely have limited effect on prescribing practice,” study author Dr. Su-Hua Wu, from the department of cardiology at First Affiliated Hospital at Sun Yat-Sen University in Guangzhou, China, said in a journal news release.

“However, given that macrolides are one of the most commonly used antibiotic groups, and millions of patients are prescribed these drugs annually, the total number of sudden cardiac deaths or ventricular tachyarrhythmias and cardiac deaths may not be negligible,” Wu added.

An average of 80 cases of rapid heartbeat that can result in sudden cardiac death (or “ventricular tachyarrhythmias”) occurred per 1 million treatment courses among patients who were not taking macrolides, the investigators found.

But, current use of macrolides was associated with an additional 118 ventricular tachyarrhythmias or related sudden cardiac deaths per 1 million treatment courses. And there were 36 additional sudden cardiac deaths from causes other than ventricular tachyarrhythmia, and 38 additional heart-related deaths per one million treatment courses, the findings showed.

Past use of macrolides and use of other antibiotics were not associated with increased heart risk, the researchers found.

To put the findings into perspective, one in 8,500 patients treated with macrolides could develop a serious heart rhythm problem and one in 30,000 might die, Dr. Sami Viskin, from the Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine at Tel Aviv University in Israel, explained in an accompanying journal editorial.

Viskin said macrolides are a first-line treatment for a number of infections.

“Today, when antimicrobial resistance represents a major threat to global health and new treatment options are frighteningly few, losing an entire class of antibiotics would represent a major setback in the fight against infections. Furthermore, it takes years to fully understand the consequences of a drug’s disappearance,” Viskin wrote.

More information

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more about antibiotics.

SOURCE: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, news release, Nov. 9, 2015

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay External Links Disclaimer Logo.   All rights reserved.

For family physician in The Woodlands, TX, USA, contact Dr. Fadi Ghanem




Even Easy Exercise May Lower Blood Pressure in Those With Diabetes

Study found just a few minutes of resistance training or walking helped.

Even Easy Exercise May Lower Blood Pressure in Those With Diabetes

MONDAY, Nov. 9, 2015 (HealthDay News) — Just a few minutes of easy exercise daily can help lower blood pressure in overweight and obese people with type 2 diabetes, researchers report.

“It appears you don’t have to do very much,” co-author Bronwyn Kingwell, head of metabolic and vascular physiology at the Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes in Melbourne, Australia, said in an American Heart Association news release.

“We saw some marked blood pressure reductions over trial days when people did the equivalent of walking to the water cooler or some simple body-weight movements on the spot,” she noted.

For the study, the researchers monitored blood pressure levels in 24 overweight and obese adults as they sat for eight hours. The average age of the study participant was 62. All had type 2 diabetes.

The study participants took brief breaks from sitting, and either walked slowly for three minutes or did three minutes of simple resistance exercises every half hour. Again, their blood pressure was monitored.

The resistance exercises included activities such as half-squats, calf raises, knee raises, or gluteal muscle squeezes.

Compared to uninterrupted sitting, light walking led to an average 10-point drop in systolic blood pressure (the top number in a blood pressure reading). Simple resistance exercise led to an average 12-point decrease in systolic blood pressure, the study reported.

“Light activity breaks are not meant to replace regular, purposeful exercise. But they may be a practical solution to cut down on sitting time, especially if you’re at your desk all day,” Kingwell said.

The study was to be presented Monday at the American Heart Association’s annual meeting in Orlando. Fla. Until published in a peer-reviewed journal, findings presented at meetings are usually considered preliminary.

More information

The U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute offers a guide to physical activity.

SOURCE: American Heart Association, news release, Nov. 9, 2015

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay External Links Disclaimer Logo.   All rights reserved.

For family physician in The Woodlands, TX, USA, contact Fadi Ghanem MD




Dr. Fadi Ghanem The Woodlands, TX, USA